Moellhausen lists it in BoldBases #3 as the round captivating smell of a walk through vineyards. The house word round is the useful one: it is a soft, filled-out grape and vineyard effect rather than a sharp fruit note, carrying the sweetness of the fruit alongside the green and earthy side of the leaf and the ground. As a compounded base it is offered as a building block, so it supplies a whole wine impression in one line where a perfumer would otherwise have to assemble grape, green and earthy materials separately.
fruitygreensweetearthywarm
Impact
6 of 10
Typical dilution
10% in solvent
What can replace Tuscan Wine B.Base?
Computed, not collected from forums. A pair covers together what one
cannot. The number is the engine's match, not a promise.
Counted from the file the app ships, the moment this page was
built.
Tuscan Wine B.Base
A written odor description
yes
Olfactive families, in dominance order
4
Sub-categories under them
3
Impact, out of 10
6
Hours on a blotter
estimated from family and band
CAS number
not on file
Supplier and trade synonyms
not on file
Constituent breakdown
not on file
All 1,860 materials
Described in words
every one
Impact rating out of 10
every one
Classified into an olfactive family
1,825
Carrying several families, in order
1,739
Sub-category assignments
7,409 across 214 pairs
A top / heart / base band
1,810
Hours on a blotter
441
CAS number
1,302
Supplier synonyms
4,935 names
Constituent breakdowns
589
Every
regulatory join - IFRA, GHS, allergens - is by CAS number, and a material can
supply one through its constituents as well as its own row, so of the
558 materials carrying no CAS number the 257 without a
constituent table are the ones that return "nothing known" rather than
"nothing applies". The blotter hours are sourced rather than measured by us, and the app
labels every one of them an estimate. There is no physical chemistry on a row:
no molecular weight, no vapour pressure, no boiling point.
The longer answer, or
the whole catalog counted.