PFW's odour description, as carried by Perfumer's Apprentice, is dry, woody, labdanum, rose, musk, orange flower, and the supplier files it in the wood family. The reading is a dry woody-labdanum core with a rose inflection, sitting over a musky orange-flower softness. In a formula it behaves as a dry ambery-woody base note that lends labdanum warmth without the sticky resinous weight of a labdanum absolute, and its musk and orange-flower side lets it sit under florals and smooth a rose or neroli accord from below. The supplier recommends assessing it in a 10 percent solution or less, so it is not a material to smell neat on a blotter.
Counted from the file the app ships, the moment this page was
built.
Orinox
A written odor description
yes
Olfactive families, in dominance order
4
Sub-categories under them
4
Impact, out of 10
6
Hours on a blotter
estimated from family and band
CAS number
yes
Supplier and trade synonyms
2
Constituent breakdown
not on file
All 2,027 materials
Described in words
every one
Impact rating out of 10
every one
Classified into an olfactive family
1,989
Carrying several families, in order
1,893
Sub-category assignments
7,409 across 214 pairs
A top / heart / base band
1,974
Hours on a blotter
441
CAS number
1,487
Supplier synonyms
5,222 names
Constituent breakdowns
667
Every
regulatory join - IFRA, GHS, allergens - is by CAS number, and a material can
supply one through its constituents as well as its own row, so of the
540 materials carrying no CAS number the 248 without a
constituent table are the ones that return "nothing known" rather than
"nothing applies". The blotter hours are sourced rather than measured by us, and the app
labels every one of them an estimate. There is no physical chemistry on a row:
no molecular weight, no vapour pressure, no boiling point.
The longer answer, or
the whole catalog counted.