Published by IFF with the same olfactive description as Ambermor: a strong woody amber, sweet earthy and musky, with a delicate animalic tonality, high heart and base impact and substantivity beyond forty-eight hours across fine fragrance, soap, shampoo, deodorant and detergent, used from traces upward. It is a readily biodegradable, stabiliser-free quality. In a formula it does what Ambermor does, giving amber-woody volume, diffusion and fixation to the whole composition. Distributor specifications give the same ambroxan CAS and describe the physical form as white flakes rather than the crystalline powder of Ambermor, so the difference on record is presentation and specification, not a published change in odour or strength.
Counted from the file the app ships, the moment this page was
built.
Ambermor-Ex
A written odor description
yes
Olfactive families, in dominance order
6
Sub-categories under them
5
Impact, out of 10
8
Hours on a blotter
estimated from family and band
CAS number
yes
Supplier and trade synonyms
not on file
Constituent breakdown
not on file
All 1,860 materials
Described in words
every one
Impact rating out of 10
every one
Classified into an olfactive family
1,825
Carrying several families, in order
1,739
Sub-category assignments
7,409 across 214 pairs
A top / heart / base band
1,810
Hours on a blotter
441
CAS number
1,302
Supplier synonyms
4,935 names
Constituent breakdowns
589
Every
regulatory join - IFRA, GHS, allergens - is by CAS number, and a material can
supply one through its constituents as well as its own row, so of the
558 materials carrying no CAS number the 257 without a
constituent table are the ones that return "nothing known" rather than
"nothing applies". The blotter hours are sourced rather than measured by us, and the app
labels every one of them an estimate. There is no physical chemistry on a row:
no molecular weight, no vapour pressure, no boiling point.
The longer answer, or
the whole catalog counted.